Yeah but I see 9.99 also for photos, and here I've read people getting 0.something cents per photo instead. And why not photography, there is a difference in hiring a model and shoot in a studio rather than traveling for pleasure with a camera with you. Shame you can't do it also for vectors, illustration and videos, since they take different amounts of time depending on the content. Side opinion: in 3D industry I feel much more in control because I can deliberately set my own price, then the royalty will apply to it and I can also opt out from website discounts if I want.
This will probably lead me to try selling 3D renders here as well, since they are photorealistic (by the way I wonder if I should put them into photography or illustration, I think "photography" would represent what a customer expects). I come from 3D modeling so I sell models on Turbosquid. But I stand to be corrected.Īverage fees look nice there (but with a bad trend I see, during the years) but how comes someone says they got 0.08 $? What is the option customers can get to purchase images for such price? I hope this is very rare.Īnd no I never tried selling vectors before, so I don't know, but I thought Alamy respects artists because doesn't offer subscriptions.
Totally guessing here, but I suspect with the amount of time it takes for a single vector, unless you manage to produce something in demand that is a repeat seller, it's otherwise likely a total waste of time.
Hi, you should take a step back and ask, what is the market like overall for vectors? Are you ever going to get back anywhere near the recompense for the time spent on a single vector, whichever agency you're with?
0 kommentar(er)
